TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Warnings and Cautions From:Howard Rauch <techxfr -at- LAKEFIELD -dot- NET> Date:Tue, 5 Aug 1997 00:51:39 -0700
Robert Plamondon wrote:
> Using "warning" to mean "danger" strikes me as being a warningous
> procedure. It just doesn't evoke the right reaction. If the
> procedure presents the user with danger, it should say DANGER.
> If you do a man-on-the-street survey, I'll bet that most would
> consider "caution" to be a higher level of threat than "warning,"
> and that "danger" would be the only one of the three that was
> consistently associated with risk of life and limb.
Whether you are right or wrong, the folks who developed ANSI Z535 don't
agree with your position. That document establishes caution as the
lowest level of threat and danger as the highest. Regardless of what the
man on the street might think or say, if I'm being deposed in liability
litigation, I would want a reliable standard to support my actions.
Technology Transfer, Inc.
"Linking Creators and Users of Technology"
933 North 18th St, Manitowoc WI 54220-3132
Voice: 920-682-1528 Fax: 920-686-0898