Re: hyperlink style question

Subject: Re: hyperlink style question
From: Penny Staples <pstaples -at- AIRWIRE -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:59:08 -0500

I prefer the second approach myself. However if it were me,
before I removed the page cross-references, I'd need to be
very sure that most of the users really do prefer to use the
document on-line (i.e., some hard stats). And that there aren't
any other weird reasons for keeping the hard-copy format
(e.g., copies need to be sent somewhere official).


>
> For example...
> Instead of:
> 'To create a process' on page 16 <with section title in hyperlink blue
> text>
> Just have:
> To create a process <in hyperlink blue text>
>
> I prefer the second -- it's simpler and cleaner. My audience tends to
> use
> the docs online, rather than printing them out. Any good reasons for
> keeping
> the quotation marks and page numbers? Is the possibility that it might
> be
> printed out a good enough reason to keep 'em?
>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Reference format?
Next by Author: AmiPro index and TOC
Previous by Thread: Re: hyperlink style question
Next by Thread: Re: hyperlink style question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads