Re: How would you

Subject: Re: How would you
From: "Peter Ring, PRC" <prc -at- ISA -dot- DKNET -dot- DK>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:41:33 +1

Kevin Freeman wrote:

> I have a question for you all. I was going over a section of a user's
> guide that a programmer wrote, and he had a section involving software
> fixes. Right now, he has them listed as:
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.
> etc. I asked him why, that numbers are generally used to denote steps
> in procedures and the like. He responded by he likes numbers because
> someone else can refer to the document and say "Let't take a look at
> fix #3."
> What do you all think? Is using numbers or bullets in this situation
> the best. I think this might be a decent topic for discussion, what
> say you?

You are right, 1., 2., etc is generally reserved for sequential
procedure steps, and bullets for non-sequential lists.

But there are other ways to solve it, and you were close to a
solution yourself. For example:

"List of error fixes: [then they know it's a list, not a procedure]
#1 afdalks sakj sdja ...
#2 oiufaen s asdf sdsfs ...
#3 skjaslk sa gskjj ..."

PS: Unless it's a programme where the user almost for sure had the
old version, I would put it into a separate document, e.g. a

Greetings from Denmark

Peter Ring
PRC (Peter Ring Consultants)
- specialists in user friendly manuals and audits on manuals.
prc -at- isa -dot- dknet -dot- dk
- the "User Friendly Manuals" website with links, bibliography, list
of prof. associations, and tips for technical writers.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Documenting GUI + new John Renish's booklist
Next by Author: Hazards words in ANSI 535 Z
Previous by Thread: Re: How would you
Next by Thread: Re: How would you

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads