TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:WORD97: is it worth upgrading? From:John -dot- Cornellier -at- PARIS -dot- IE -dot- PHILIPS -dot- COM Date:Fri, 29 Aug 1997 12:41:52 +0200
There has been a few postings to this list expressing regret for having
upgraded to Word97 from Word 6/95. Anyone think the upgrade _is_ worth the
I am using Word 6 and have some well-developed templates and macros. They ain't
broke, so I'm not looking to fix them. However, my company has just bought Word
97, so I can change if I like.
I am particularly concerned about having to convert my macros - is this
something I'm going to have to face up to eventually anyway?
I would also appreciate any comments on the following:
The hypertext links to other MS Office objects look useful - or not?
Version recording is an idea whose time has come, but the functionality looks
very limited. Anyhow I've got used to doing manual saves, incrementing the file
name as I go.
The help says the spellchecker is better. Is it?
Apparently the revision functions are easier to use. But I don't use revision
Is Mr Animated Paperclip, using IntelliSense(tm) natural language of any
interest to advanced users?
Any functional advantages to the new macro language?
Any other issues - stability, memory hoggage, add-ons?
If I get enough I'll summarise to the list.
John mailto:john -dot- cornellier -at- paris -dot- ie -dot- philips -dot- com