Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- ROGERS -dot- WAVE -dot- CA>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 23:27:16 -0800

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997 14:15:20 -0700, Jeffrey Pittman wrote:

>So what terminology do you use when you write instructions
>for setting up multiple hard drives? My CMOS settings, and
>any others I have seen, need to be told what the specs are
>for the master (bootable) hard drive and the slave hard drive.
>Or, do you just reject the entire concept and live with only
>one hard drive no matter how full it gets.

Well, you could just go with SCSI... hard to get negative meanings from
ID numbers 0 through 7.



Your friend and mine,
Matt
<insert standard disclaimer here>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

They shoot without shame / In the name of a piece of dirt
For a change of accent / Or the color of your shirt
Better the pride that resides / In a Citizen of the World
Than the pride that divides / When a colorful rag is unfurled
- Rush, "Territories"

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads