Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Buck and Tilly Buchanan <writer -at- WF -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 16:43:28 -0500

If negative connotations must be searched for when they are not in context,
to limit your writing by not using them is not productive.
--------

Sent from a very busy extra bedroom in our house,
sometimes also called InterAmerican Publications.
--------
Buck and Tilly Buchanan

----------
> From: Melissa Hunter-Kilmer <mhunterk -at- BNA -dot- COM>
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
> Date: Thursday, September 18, 1997 12:16 PM
>
> Summary for those who don't want to go through this rather long
> post:
>
> If the dominant meaning of a word has negative connotations,
> seems to me one should avoid that word unless one wants to evoke
> those connotations.
>
> Okay, now the long part:
>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: RoboHELP and Office 97??
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads