Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Wally Glassett <wallyg -at- THEGRID -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:16:37 -0700

Buck and Tilly Buchanan wrote:

> >
> > Well, you could just go with SCSI... hard to get negative meanings
> from
> > ID numbers 0 through 7.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your friend and mine,
> > Matt
>
> Quite the contrary, Matt. Certain ethnic groups absolutely MUST BE
> NUMBER
> ONE. They would be offended.
>
> --------
>
> Sent from a very busy extra bedroom in our house,
> sometimes also called InterAmerican Publications.
> --------
> Buck and Tilly Buchanan
>

Just couldn't pass on this one...

Must people think of SCSI as 'scuzzy,' however it has also been referred
to as 'sexy' - although this is certainly a 'minority' viewpoint. Of
course, since I'm somewhat iconoclastic and also like to have fun with
the vernacular when possible, I use this pronunciation at times around
techno-geeks who take their terminology a little too seriously. I think
it helps to 'master' the language, and also helps to avoid becoming a
'slave' to convention.

Wally Glassett

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re[2]: Master/Slave
Next by Author: Re: Inch per Second
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads