TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:User Feedback From:Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:35:11 +0800
Another tip, based on my own experience: if you're collecting the
feedback yourself, don't give the slightest hint that you had anything
to do with producing the current docs. Lie Creatively mislead if
you have to.
Whenever I've been introduced as "This is Stuart, our Documentation
Manager" or "This is Stuart, the guy who writes the manuals", the
feedback has been vague and useless -- "OK, quite good, all right,
Whenever I've used one of my other titles -- "Stuart the User Interface
Designer", "Stuart the Tea Lady", "Stuart the Technical Rhetorician" --
the feedback has been much more specific and honest.
The very best feedback has come when I've managed to imply that I'm
some sort of outsider who's been brought in the overhaul the 'old'
docs. It's not that customers go on a raging flamefest, but they do
loosen up and talk about what's missing and what they'd like to see
Senior Euphuistic Rhabdomancer
Functional Software Pty Ltd mailto:slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au