Re: predicting successful writers

Subject: Re: predicting successful writers
From: Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:21:03 -0600

Hillary Jones wrote:

> A couple of months back, my company advertised for an entry-level
> writer, and we got an applicant who had no writing experience
> whatsoever; when we asked him about his qualifications for the position,
> he kept emphasizing that we'd advertised for entry-level! He took that
> to mean that he didn't really need qualifications (other than a desire
> to learn). Personally I didn't know what to make of that--*does*
> entry-level mean no experience whatsoever? When people advertise for an
> entry-level writer, what sort of qualifications are they expecting?

I've always seen "entry level" used to mean knowledge and/or training
without professional experience. I would expect an entry-level writer to
know how to write, not simply to be willing to learn how to write. And
if an applicant claims to know how to write, I expect some proof. That
doesn't necessarily mean they have a portfolio of their professional
work -- they should have written enough in school or previous jobs (I
did a *lot* of writing before I was officially called a technical
writer) to show they can write. And if they've never written anything,
the desire to write might make them a candidate for OJT or an
internship, but not (IMHO) an entry-level position.

Tracy

--
==============================================
Tracy Boyington tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
Oklahoma Department of Vocational and Technical Education
Stillwater, OK, USA
http://www.okvotech.org/cimc/home.htm
==============================================


If it's about technical communication--post it! If not, don't!
Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.


Previous by Author: Re: document ownership/plagiarism (kind of long)
Next by Author: Re: USAGE: "Therefore" and "thus"
Previous by Thread: Re: predicting successful writers
Next by Thread: Re: predicting successful writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads