Re: Acronyms--RTFM, now PDF printing

Subject: Re: Acronyms--RTFM, now PDF printing
From: Miark <miark -at- MIJENIX -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 15:08:12 -0600

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilcox, John (WWC, Contractor) <wilcoxj -at- WDNI -dot- COM>
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU <TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU>
Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Acronyms--RTFM


>I see this horse isn't quite dead yet, so I guess it's OK to beat it.


And let me be the first to congratulate you on a job well done.

B^)

On to other things. Becca wrote that 3.0 PDF files don't print
well on PS printers. Can anyone else verify this? Is Adobe working
on this?

I looks like I'll have to post two versions of my PDF docs--a 3.0
version for those with a PS printer, and a 2.1 version for everyone
else. Any other strategies out there?

Mike

Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.



Previous by Author: PDF printing problems--solution?
Next by Author: Zip a proper noun?
Previous by Thread: Geeks are good... daggone good!
Next by Thread: Universal Formats and <eh hem> acronyms


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads