TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Specifications From:Joe Miller <joemiller -at- CANBERRA -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:04:44 -0500
>2. Does anyone have any suggestions as to dealing with stubborn project
>leaders who don't seem to think these are important . I have tried the
>"legal liability" argument and the "we need them to write the manual"
>argument but to little avail.
I suspect you'll get compliance only when the directive comes from the top,
and maybe not even then. (Engineers are notoriously pigheaded. <GG>)
And to convince the top, you'll have to prove that following standards is
more cost and time effective than random chaos.