Re[2]: Documenting for LCD or most common?

Subject: Re[2]: Documenting for LCD or most common?
From: Jamie Yeager <jyeager -at- RADSYS -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 11:34:43 -0500

barry-
i tried writing in collages, but they always stuck to my pen...finally i went to
decoupage instead...
jamie yeager
radian systems
"they can't pay me enough to have my opinions for me"

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Documenting for LCD or most common?
Author: barry -dot- kieffer -at- EXGATE -dot- TEK -dot- COM at Internet
Date: 2/13/98 08:20


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Arnett [SMTP:Keith_Arnett -at- RESTON -dot- OMD -dot- STERLING -dot- COM]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 1998 7:13 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Documenting for LCD or most common?
>
> Despite the shared name (and some functionality), Win 3.1 and Win
> 95
> are two different operating systems, and generally speaking, they
> should be documented separately.

The differences between Win 3.x and Win 95 are vast. Entire
papers are written in collages on this topic.




Previous by Author: FrameMaker question
Next by Author: Need Word 97 Help
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Documenting for LCD or most common?
Next by Thread: Re: Documenting for LCD or most common?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads