Non-ugly, non-proportional font

Subject: Non-ugly, non-proportional font
From: Beth Lisberg <BBEGIN -at- AOL -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 23:19:06 EST

Subj: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font
Date: 98-02-16 23:18:01 EST
From: BBEGIN
To: lewism -at- brandle -dot- com -dot- au

I'm working on a project and found that Quick Type Condensed works out well
for teeny screen reprints, for a job aid.

I'm using Quick Type Mono for other parts of the screen "shots," and they work
out well.

Beth Conney Lisberg
BEGINNINGS
BBEGIN -at- aol -dot- com




Previous by Author: Summary: URL style
Next by Author: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font
Previous by Thread: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font
Next by Thread: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads