TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Frame 4 book PDF help needed please From:David Hirschler <DGHirschler -at- AUTOMATEDLOGIC -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:24:55 -0500
Your Frame files may be saved in View-only format. Try unlocking them (in
Windows) by pressing Esc F l (lowercase) k . On the Mac try
When you print the book file, don't use PDF writer. Instead, print to a
Postscript printer that has been routed to a file, and then distill the
file into a PDF. Or, you could use Acrobat Exchange to stitch the PDF
files together into one PDF file.
-- David Hirschler
>Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:54:54 GMT
>From: John Cornellier <john -dot- cornellier -at- CARDS -dot- DELARUE -dot- COM>
>Subject: Frame 4 book PDF help needed please
>Greetings from Paris,
>I have a 1000-page Frame 4 document consisting of 5 books, each containing
>Still with me? Good. I have the doc on a CD (so read only). Also each file
>different print configuations (numbers of copies, thumbnails, etc.)
>We only have Frame licenses for the TWs, so the CD is not readable by
>else. Someone wants the entire doc printed, but I prefer to transform it
>more popular format (PDF) and then let them print the bits they need as
>Some of the doc's fonts are not on my system. I copied the files onto my
HD so I
>can reformat and save them, but when I Ctrl+S, Frame says "cannot open
>for writing". The files are not read-only, so why is this?
>To get around this I do a File \ Save As (why is there no kbd shortcut for
>this?) for each file into another directory. But then the book file
>defunct (I must re-add the files with their new paths or regenerate the
>I want to output each book as one big PDF file, but when I print from the
>the PDF writer produces lots of individual PDF files. These are not very
>because they are not named in any coherent manner - the only way to know
>order they go is to look in the book file.