TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: In Defense of PDFs From:"Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 6 Mar 1998 16:18:16 -0600
If this were a real task, rather than a grail/football in a holy war,
I'm sure many of us would put most of the document in HTML and include a
link to a PDF (or other add-in) version of the graphic.
Or some of us might use the autocad file directly, and include a link
for an autocad drawing viewer that the user can download.
>From: David Knopf [SMTP:david -at- KNOPF -dot- COM]
>Sent: Friday, March 06, 1998 12:19 PM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: In Defense of PDFs
>At 10:45 AM 3/6/98 -0600, Wing, Michael J wrote:
>>> One thing I really like about PDF images is that they are scalable. You =
>>> can zoom in and really see the details - even on a laptop. It is a =
>>> great way to put B-sized schematics on line. I can't imagine how I'd do =
>>> that with HTML or anything else for that matter.
>>Ok, here's how. The following increases the size of the schematic GIF by a
>>factor of 1.5 every time it (the image) is clicked. It decreases the size
>>by a factor of 1.5 whenever the image is double-clicked.
>Yes, this would work ... once you've converted your autocad drawing or
>postscript image to an enormous highly detailed GIF (postscript to GIF is
>always a fun conversion) ... once you've ensured that all of your users are
>running a current version of IE so that the VB script will work (too bad for
>Netscape users) ... and once you've compelled your users to endure a very
>download to get the image onto their local system ... and once they've
>out the click/double-click semantic ...
>Of course you wouldn't have to worry about these issues with a PDF, but
>right, you could do it with an HTML file and a GIF image.