Acrobat 2.1 vs 3.0

Subject: Acrobat 2.1 vs 3.0
From: "Metzger, Lucinda" <cmetzger -at- DUKANE -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 08:51:35 -0600

Good morning, all.

A co-worker is having problems with his bitmap images when creating PDFs
with Acrobat version 3.01. I advised him to try version 3.0, since I'm
using it without a problem, and since someone on this list said there
were known problems with 3.01. However, my co-worker doesn't have 3.0 --
only 2.1 and 3.01.

My question is this: What are the big differences between 2.1 and 3.0?
I've looked through the archives and found that 3.0 creates smaller file
sizes, and 2.1 takes longer to print. But it seems to me there was some
other, significant reason why 3.0 was much better. Anyone got a minute
to enlighten me?

TIA,
Cindy
cmetzger -at- dukane -dot- com




Previous by Author: Framemaker vs. Interleaf
Next by Author: Corel Photo-Paint Question
Previous by Thread: JOB: Short term; FrameMaker Req; NJ
Next by Thread: Dynamic Document Building (long)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads