Re: Where is best authority on current Mil Standard practice?

Subject: Re: Where is best authority on current Mil Standard practice?
From: "Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 10:09:24 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Johnson [SMTP:michaelj -at- OECMED -dot- COM]
<snip>
> Active duty military reviewers are easier to deal with than civil =
> service types who know the specs better, but it helps to be a good
> poker =
> player in either situation.
>
---------
Hey! I resemble that remark!

Bev Parks
parksb -at- emh1 -dot- hqisec -dot- army -dot- mil
Friendly Faces of TECHWR-L......
http://www.bayside.net/users/cbsites/techwr-l/




Previous by Author: Re: Quick question on the word Incorporation/Incorporated, etc,
Next by Author: Re: Close vs Exit
Previous by Thread: Re: Where is best authority on current Mil Standard practice?
Next by Thread: Re: Where is best authority on current Mil Standard practice?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads