TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: QUESTION: CBT v. Training From:Dave McGill <david -dot- mcgill -at- SENECAC -dot- ON -dot- CA> Date:Mon, 16 Mar 1998 20:06:48 -0500
ELISSA LYNN BEBEE wrote:
> My department has recently taken a major hit as far as our trainers are
> concerned. The company believes that we can replace the trainers with well
> written and intuitively developed CBTs.
I think "Intuitively Developed CBTs" is one of those deceptively
simplistic phrases, sort of like "well written manual". If you want to
train for a widely used application, like Word or Win95, then there are
a variety of good off the shelf products, which are probably much better
than anything you could create in-house. Good CBTs are very difficult to
create and very expensive. If you want a good custom solution you won't
be saving any money in the short term.
> I tend to agree with my company
> that CBTs offer more than a trainer because they can present the same
> material as a trainer would but for much less money. What are some
> thoughts out there on Computer Based Training versus training in the
I'm a career classroom teacher and I've been developing CBT and teaching
with it for the last couple of years. In my opinion CBT may be
comparable for a well motivated good student, but students like that
make up a minority of my current audience (first year college students).
>Are we just fooling ourselves or is CBT the next wave of effective
> information transmission.
It can be effective, particularly for motivated learners. I think we are
at the end of the beginning with respect to our knowledge of what works,
and why it works. So yes, you can probably replace your trainers with
_good_ CBT, but if you're doing it by yourselves, it will take a long
time and a lot of money.