TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: QUESTION: CBT v. Training From:Jon Leer <jleer -at- LTC -dot- MV -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 17 Mar 1998 08:45:17 -0500
It depends on what the company and your customers expect. If your customers
are more comfortable with a group thing - get everybody trained all at once
in the shortest amount of time - with the benefit of socialization, then a
greater benefit rests with the live trainer. Also, the company may feel
that the socialization after the sale is beneficial to future business.
A CBT course would certainly present consistent training at a lower cost.
However, "live" training may be a big revenue generator for your company.
I would guess that the ideal situation would be to present live training
for the socialization and post-sale benefit plus the revenue generation and
add supplemental courses CBT-based.
> From: ELISSA LYNN BEBEE <elb600z -at- MAIL -dot- ODU -dot- EDU>
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: QUESTION: CBT v. Training
> Date: Monday, March 16, 1998 6:05 PM
> My department has recently taken a major hit as far as our trainers are
> concerned. The company believes that we can replace the trainers with
> written and intuitively developed CBTs. I tend to agree with my company
> that CBTs offer more than a trainer because they can present the same
> material as a trainer would but for much less money. What are some
> thoughts out there on Computer Based Training versus training in the
> flesh. Are we just fooling ourselves or is CBT the next wave of effective
> information transmission.