TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>I'd like to be able to flag certain word pairs that are easy to switch.
>My head knows the difference between "form" and "from," but my fingers
I know there is a way to do this in Word. A former co-worker configured
my spellcheck so it would not recognize some common spelling errors that
are actually real words. When I spellchecked a document it stopped at
words like "massage" (instead of message) and "filed" (instead of
Does anyone know how to do this?? I would love to set this up on my
This friend will be visiting at the end of this week and I can ask him
about it then.
David S. Klein
Technical Writer - Amdocs
> From: Huber, Mike[SMTP:mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 1998 9:41 AM
> Subject: Re: odd spelling-checker action
> Spell checking could be a lot better. I'd like the spell checker on my
> email (MS Outlook) to recognize names in my address book (or at least
> the To: field) as valid. I've had email systems insert things like
> and then complain about those very things.
> But I agree that the more serious problem is that the dictionaries are
> too wide. I just had one of my reviewers catch me - I skipped a "u"
> turned "value" into "vale." I'm extremely unlikely ever to use the
> "vale" on purpose in a technical context. If it's in a help file it's
> almost certainly a slip of the fingers. I'd rather have it caught by
> machine than by a person.
> There is a real low-tech version of the AI that Dick suggests: custom
> I've toyed with the idea of getting rid of the basic dictionary
> altogether, and building a custom dictionary that includes all the
> that appear in my work. The first few pages would be slow going,
> clicking Add all the time. But the vocabulary I use at work is pretty
> limited (this isn't a practical solution for fiction) so I'm guessing
> wouldn't be long before I had it all entered.
> I'd like to be able to flag certain word pairs that are easy to
> My head knows the difference between "form" and "from," but my fingers
> don't. It would have to be configurable, though. Maybe I'm odd, but
> too, two" has never been a problem for me and I'd hate to have to
> OK for those words all the time.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dick Margulis [SMTP:ampersandvirgule -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net]
> >Sent: Saturday, March 14, 1998 12:27 PM
> >To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> >Subject: Re: odd spelling-checker action
> >My theory is this: Given the horsepower we now have on our desktops,
> >should be possible to implement a much smarter approach to spell
> >checking. (This is related to, and may turn out to be an extension
> >the approach used in grammar checkers, which could also use some
> >tweaking.) Look in any printed dictionary. Words have multiple
> >and where those meanings pertain to a technical field, the lexies
> >conveniently specified that fact.
> >I think it would be feasible (any software developers out there
> >listening?) to apply some artificial intelligence to catch words that
> >are real (that is, they exist in the dictionary) but that are out of
> >place (that is, they are unlikely to occur in the midst of all the
> >words in this text). As a first pass, I'm willing--as a user--to
> >menu choices to indicate what field I'm working in (mechanical
> >engineering, zoology, metaphysics, whatever), if that helps.
> >Has anyone else been thinking along these lines? Know of any work
> >done? Is this way too esoteric a topic for this list?