TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: job in NY From:Chris Hamilton <chamilton -at- GR -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:16:34 -0600
Matt Danda wrote (liberally snipped):
> I feel strongly about learning science in order to advance a tech
> writing career. When I interview for jobs or contracts, I always
> stress the technical aspects of my resume. In fact, interviewers seem
> to trust the fact that I can write, but are very discerning when it
> comes to technical abilities. (ie configuring Windows95, understanding O-O
> methodologies, reading C++ code, etc.). I spend much of my free time
> studying new technical skills (in my specialty of choice, which is
> software development)
> rather than brushing up on my writing skills. Its a shame, but I am a
> slave to the market...and the market wants more technologists.
I could not agree more. I was a programmer for a few years before turning
from the dark side. The time I spent as a programmer is as valuable for me
as the time I've spent as a technical writer. I'd add Java to Matt's list of
chamilton -at- gr -dot- com
My views, not my employer's.