TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: CBT vs. Stand up From:Jason Willebeek-LeMair <jlemair -at- ITEXCHSRV2 -dot- PHX -dot- MCD -dot- MOT -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 20 Mar 1998 13:31:56 -0700
Gosh. I guess you never met my wife. She remembers everything she
hears, which makes it nearly impossible to win an argument. 8-)
More to the point, what do you consider CBT. When I think of it, I
think of a (perhaps multimedia) application, developed in something like
Authorware, that can instruct and, in a limited manner, provide
If that is the case, why bother with CBT? Why not just train directly
on the application?
For example, I went to a Visual Basic class. It was a combination of
lecture (this is a method, here is what you can do with it, etc.) and
hands-on programming. The instructor was invaluable because I tend to
ask a LOT of questions (what if. . ., what about. . ., can you. . .).
I tried a CBT version of Visual Basic training, which was okay, but it
could not anticipate all of my questions, which I found to be very
frustrating and limiting.
If you consider CBT to be hands on training (like my VB class), then of
course I agree -- that way is best. But if I recall correctly (and I am
not my wife, so my recollection may not be accurate), the original post
had to do with eliminating the instructor in favor of CBT, which I think
is a BAD THING (at least for the level of detail I usually demand).
I must say, though, that I have never been to a class on computer
software that was not hands-on.
> From: Scott Gray
> Reply To: Scott Gray
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 1998 1:02 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: CBT vs. Stand up
> Who on this list disagrees with the following saying?
> I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do and I understand"
> -Chinese Proverb