TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: CBT vs. Stand up From:"Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:40:10 -0600
"I hear and I forget, I see and I forget, I do and I forget"
Frankly, the idea that you can determine the ultimate best form of
instruction without specifying the topic, the audience, the resources
available, or the desired outcome of the instruction is absurd.
And that's what this thread seems to be about.
mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com
Home: nax -at- execpc -dot- com
>From: Scott Gray [SMTP:scotty -at- CM -dot- MATH -dot- UIUC -dot- EDU]
>Sent: Friday, March 20, 1998 2:03 PM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: CBT vs. Stand up
>Who on this list disagrees with the following saying?
>I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do and I understand"