Estimatime the reader's intelligence RE: placement and annotation of screen captures in step-by-step instructions for software manuals

Subject: Estimatime the reader's intelligence RE: placement and annotation of screen captures in step-by-step instructions for software manuals
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 08:44:58 -0500

As a user, I read manuals with about %1 of my available intelligence.

%90 is dedicated to the task I'm trying to accomplish. That would be
something like "mow the lawn", not "operate the lawnmower".

%90 of what's left is dedicated to the tool that I'm trying to use. Here
is where "operate the lawnmower" fits.

The remaining %1 is divided between reading the manual and imagining
tortures to apply to the idiot who designed the tool so badly as to
require me to read a manual when I just want to get the grass cut. :-)

Don't worry about overestimating my intelligence. As a reader, I enjoy
reading Einstein's explanations of Relativity and working out the
metaphors and relationships in Norse poetry. As a victim of
documentation, I prefer to have everything spelled out as simply as
possible.

---
Office:mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com
Home:nax -at- execpc -dot- com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Leila Meyer [SMTP:Leila -dot- Meyer -at- MEGASYS -dot- COM]
>...I think that so many circles and call-outs clutters the
>page and suggests that the reader isn't intelligent enough to get the
>necessary information from the numbered steps and accompanying screen
>captures. Am I overestimating the intelligence of the average reader?
>Should I include the call-outs?
>




Previous by Author: Re: text conventions/spec. round off &c
Next by Author: Re: The future
Previous by Thread: Rules of Thumb for Web Backgrounds
Next by Thread: Good books summary


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads