Re: The future

Subject: Re: The future
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 16:15:07 -0500

I hope not.

It's a very pretty site, but it's a victory of flash over communication.

I missed something. I hit the back button, which took me all the way out
of the presentation. Then I had to sit through the song and dance. I
forgot what it was I was looking for before I got back to it.

Very cool graphic and sound presentation, but interactivity means more
than big flashy cartoons on mouseover events. I didn't feel in control
enough, because I had to wait for video effects that I had already seen

For a site advertising a movie or for a trade-show booth demo, or some
other situation where impressing the viewer is more important than
repeat viewing or finding information, it would be great. But it's
firmly rooted in the past, in the video tradition.

And I hit a script error that kept me out of the samples.

Office:mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com
Home:nax -at- execpc -dot- com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian Ferguson [SMTP:IanFe -at- ATTACHMATE -dot- COM]
>I have a comment that is somewhat related to your question. When I
>visit, I feel like I'm looking at the future.
>Turn your computer's speakers up and look around. The site is designed
>by a 19 year old kid...

Previous by Author: Estimatime the reader's intelligence RE: placement and annotation of screen captures in step-by-step instructions for software manuals
Next by Author: Re: Re[2]: Salaries in Chicago & where ever
Previous by Thread: Re: The future
Next by Thread: Re: The future

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads