TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I have to write a draft (Beta) users guide in three weeks.
We use Word 97. (I'm new--three months old). Our application is VERY graphic and so the users guides contain lots of screen scrapes. I have written two guides so far in Word 97, and it's been a nightmare. The graphics don't stay locked in place. If you insert too much text before the image, Word 97 throws off the graphics willy-nilly, sometimes as far as two pages away. I don't remember having this problem with 6.0.
I have Pagemaker and Framemaker. Problem is: I don't know these software packages. Does anyone have any comments regarding this situation. (I am an experienced Quark Xpress and Publisher user.)
I need a program that provides graphic stability like a desktop publisher, but the flow of Word. The worst part is I need to be able to learn the software quickly! No text boxes--I don't want to be moving those babies around!
Comments regarding the Word 97 graphic issue? Anyone else out there experienced this? Should I use 6.0 instead?
Is Pagemaker or Framemaker my answer? Are they easy enough to learn to be able to produce a 50-75 page document loaded with graphics in three weeks? (Being able to use the book feature of Pagemaker isn't necessary--our guide is single-sided, GBC bound, one-color, printed from the HP laserjet--not a high-end piece.)