Re: OK, good responses on parts lists, now how about foldouts?

Subject: Re: OK, good responses on parts lists, now how about foldouts?
From: Dick Margulis <ampersandvirgule -at- WORLDNET -dot- ATT -dot- NET>
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 21:19:11 -0400

Metzger, Lucinda wrote:
>
>
> I'll be interested to hear how others are doing this, and how they've
> overcome the problems of legibility when shrinking a D-size drawing
> down.
>
> >----------


In this situation I treat the paper 11 x 17 drawing as a useless piece
of tree that is included because the contract says it has to be, and I
strongly urge the use of PDF files on CD or online as the _real_
documentation. The zoom tool brings that bad boy up to the level where
it meets accessibility guidelines for the visually impaired.




Previous by Author: Re: [Fwd: Question for Tech Writers' List]
Next by Author: Re: #$ -at- % secretary stuff and the Grammar Guru
Previous by Thread: Re: OK, good responses on parts lists, now how about foldouts?
Next by Thread: Re: more #$ -at- %#^&$# secretary stuff


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads