TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Team Reviews of Word 97 docs From:Hope Cascio <hope -dot- d -dot- cascio -at- US -dot- ARTHURANDERSEN -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 18 May 1998 10:00:34 -0400
We've used the comment and revision tracking features very successfully
since we moved to Word 97 last year. Some folks had to get used to using
the comments feature, rather than just typing things like questions and
requests into the document, but I've sent out a few informational notes to
the SMEs, and it's gotten better. Until this summer, we've produced only
online Help, and comments helped me sleep easier at night, knowing my SMEs
questions to me couldn't be accidentally compiled into the Help. The
revision tracking didn't require any learning curve from the SMEs, except
to learn how to switch the view so they could see what the document would
look like if revisions were all accepted, or all rejected. We keep a
password on all of the documents, so SMEs can't make changes that the tech
writers never know about.
To: TECHWR-L @ LISTSERV.OKSTATE.EDU
cc: (bcc: Hope D. Cascio)
From: ac158 -at- CHEBUCTO -dot- NS -dot- CA
Date: 05/15/98 08:18 AM
Subject: Team Reviews of Word 97 docs
I'm curious about the Word 97 functions for tracking docs: having
reviewers insert comments, using revision marks, etc. Has anyone been using
these features successfully for doc reviews?
Suzanne Townsend <ac158 -at- chebucto -dot- ns -dot- ca>