an indexing question

Subject: an indexing question
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 14:03:39 +0800

It's hard to certain without knowing the real characteristics in your
database, but a general attribute such as 'colour' doesn't seem like
a useful search path. Readers aren't likely to look up the index
knowing that they're interested in a red thing, but not knowing what
the thing itself is. They're also not likely to be interested in
seeing grouped together all red things or all colourful things.

They *are* likely to want to see the main attributes of an object
grouped together, especially if the references are scattered through
the book:

Dingus
colour 17, 20
texture 18, 92
replacing 65

If all the references are tightly clustered, there's no need to be
excessively detailed. Remember that the purpose of the index is not to
do away with the book, it's to steer the reader quickly toward the
right place in the book. Avoid this sort of thing:

Dingus
adding 16
colour 17
material 17
overview 14-15
price 18
replacing 65
shape 17
size 17
texture 17
weight 18

This is usually better:

Dingus 14-18
adding 16-18
replacing 65

If I'm telling a taxi driver where I want to go, I don't tell them how
to find my front door while we're still at the airport. I just want to
get us first to the right general area, then when we get close I can say
"Left here, right at the lights, I live under that bridge over there."

Regards
---
Stuart Burnfield "Some wear their heart on their sleeve
Functional Software Some wear the patience of saints
mailto:slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au Some wear the weight of the world on their shoulders"
-- Deborah Conway 'String of Pearls'




Previous by Author: Template overriding usability (Was: not a slam)
Next by Author: Re: Humor as a communication technique
Previous by Thread: Re: an indexing question
Next by Thread: Re: an indexing question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads