TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In general, I agree with Dave's post, but according to Ambia's own web
site, Re:mark does *not* work with the free Acrobat reader, so your
reviewers still need to have probably Acrobat Exchange. This was a drawback
for us in doing online reviews. That, and the fact that people simply
didn't go get the documents from the web sites, as they had promised to do.
Here's the Ambia description, taken from their own site:
Re:mark(R) is a redlining tool for document review in a workgroup setting.
Add annotations like hilites, strike-thrus and comments directly on the
screen and eliminate paper drafts completely. Now you can distribute
documents for review, and receive comments back electronically. (Note:
Re:mark does not work with the free Acrobat Reader)
Since I'm working on an HTML-converted document, my devos challenged me to
do my docspec in HTML, and that they DID read!
