TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Page ranges in an index From:Marylee Hendricks <marylee_hendricks -at- RETEK -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 11 Sep 1998 16:00:58 -0500
I would use "to" to show the page range. You have to do something, and
putting in "to" is clear and simple, and doesn't take up too much room. I
think that covers the requirements for an index solution.
Retek Information Systems
Technical Editor - Training
Phone: 612.630.5642 Fax: 612.630.5710
Email: marylee_hendricks -at- retek -dot- com
From: David Knopf [SMTP:david -at- KNOPF -dot- COM]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 1998 3:38 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Page ranges in an index
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Technical Writers List; for all Technical Communication
| [mailto:TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU]On Behalf Of Stephen D.
| Sent: Friday, September 11, 1998 9:47 AM
| To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
| Subject: Page ranges in an index
| Hi Techwrlers,
| I've developing a manual with two-level page numbers in each
| (e.g., the first page in chapter 4 is page 4-1). We're doing this
| facilitate easy changes to the manual.
| Now, I am building an index (FrameMaker) and I want to indicate a
| range for some topics. It looks awkward, since there is a dash
| in the page number. For example:
| "4-1-4-3" to indicate" 4-1 to 4-3"
| I can think of several approaches:
| 1. Don't use ranges (a cop-out)
| 2. Use the word "to" as a separator (awkward and dumb-looking)
| 3. Use an en- or em-dash for the "to" part (doesn't really do the
| very well)
We always use "to" in this situation. Guess we don't mind being