Re: Perfect binding vs. 3-ring binders

Subject: Re: Perfect binding vs. 3-ring binders
From: Horace Smith <hsmith -at- WT -dot- NET>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 18:06:56 -0500

Cost is certainly a factor, but how about customer consideration?

Remember,
1. 3-ring binders open flat and stay that way. Try to fix something when
you have to use two hands to hold the manual open.
2. Manuals in binders update easily. If the customer doesn't do the
update, that's not your problem.

At 06:56 AM 9/23/98 -0600, Geoff Hart wrote:
>Mark Dykstra <<[would] like to write a convincing case that we would
>be better off going with perfect binding [than 3-ring binders]>>
>
>geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
>
>When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its
place.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
>
>
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>
>
>

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: Gender
Next by Author: Re: Office97 bug fixes: update
Previous by Thread: Re: Perfect binding vs. 3-ring binders
Next by Thread: Re: Perfect binding vs. 3-ring binders


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads