TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In a stunning landslide victory which even the biased pre-election polls
didn't anticipate, kHz has effectively muzzled the KHz which has
traditionally dominated so many of the radio dials we grew up with. Upon
hearing the final results Chancellor KHz announced his resignation
immediately, stating he accepts full responsibility for the election
The current tally results are:
Although I had encountered many of the supporting arguments for kHz before,
it was nice to have them so finely (and sometimes emphatically) articulated
in the replies. Several respondents also noted that 'k' denoted 1000, while
'K' denoted 1024 (as in binary computer-speak things such as memory size).
(Please overlook my overuse (abuse?) of parenthesis within this summary;
they are, of course, entirely parenthetical to this discussion.)
Here's some excerpts citing their sources and giving interesting thoughts
(with the author's names excluded due to my personal attraction to
<<consult a science style guide such as the Council of Biology Editors or
Chemical Society guides, not a computer guide>>
<<kHz is right... ...of course if it's silkscreened on the panel KHZ,
that's what you'd go with.>>
<<Philip Rubens' "Science and Technical Writing, A Manual Of Style" (and a
most excellent book), explains the the lowecase k should be used as an
abbreviation for kilo>>
<<The official source "SI Units in Engineering and Technology"
(S.H.Qasim, Pergamon Press, ISBN 0 08 0212786), says small 'k'
(kilo). However, the Oxford Dictionary of Computing allows either.
Colloquial use has adopted k for 1000 and the computer 'kilo' (2^^10
= 1024) when referring to memory size.>>
<<The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Telecommunications,
Muller defines k (kilo) as "one thousand" and K (kilo) as "one thousand and
Thanx to all respondents. You rock my world.
Spectrum Signal Processing, Inc.
dave_neufeld -at- spectrumsignal -dot- com
"no matter where you go..... there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai