TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Contractions, levels of formality From:Paul Anderson <ldi -at- CANUCK -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 3 Nov 1998 17:15:33 -0700
Interesting thread. The level of formality is something I'm sure we all
wrestle with. While I was uncomfortable with a blanket ban on contractions
in technical writing, the writer posting to that effect made a valid point
about credibility with the reader and the invisibility of the writer. My
own position would be more or less that audience and purpose should drive
Writing product descriptions or an internet book for a young computer
audience will likely mean changes in style and register -- from, say, a
text instructing someone in the handling of radioactive materials.
I write frequently for adults returning to school. I'm convinced that a
friendly, informal tone does a great deal to address their 'affective
filters' -- anxiety in particular. But I wouldn't try to use this tone
For what it's worth
>I'd be interested to hear what people have to say about contractions.
>There are more formal
>and less formal forms of writing,all of which can be called technical.
>to keep in mind Winston Churchill, who is supposed to have said (about
>"That is nonsense with which I will not up put."
>Author: Official Netscape JavaBeans developer's guide
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
ldi -at- canuck -dot- com