TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML-Benefit? From:Bill Burns <BillDB -at- ILE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:10:27 -0700
> Interesting opinion, but based on what?
> Please, as a Technical Communicator, be specific. You wrote of the
> lecturers' credentials, but nothing of the information he imparted that
> triggered your resounding rejection of html-based help.
I have to second this request. I heard Joe speak at the Help Technology
Update in Boston last month, and I heard nothing to suggest that
HTML-*based* help systems were not a viable solution now. I agree that MS
HTMLHelp is not as well defined as it should be and that some of its
features lack robustness. I also agree that it doesn't make sense to go to
HTML-based help unless there is a compelling business case to do so.
Cross-platform compatibility and web delivery are two such compelling
reasons. I do believe the major HAT vendors and technology developers need
to do a bit more homework.
ILE Communications/Eccentric Technology Consultant
billdb -at- ile -dot- com
> Call me fish meal.