Re: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker

Subject: Re: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker
From: "David M. Brown" <dmbrown -at- BROWN-INC -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 09:56:18 -0800

Kathleen Mattson wrote:
>
> "why do *TechWriters* prefer Framemaker while Marketing and design folks
> prefer Quark and Pagemaker?" question.

Each group is drawn by the relative strengths and weaknesses of the
tool:

* FM's strength is large document management.

* Q and PM excel at page layout.

--David

=============================
David M. Brown - Brown Inc.
dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
=============================

N O W A V A I L A B L E ! (http://www.html-indexer.com/)

Try HTML Indexer, the easiest way to create and maintain real
back-of-the-book indexes for web sites and other HTML documents.


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: signage
Next by Author: Re: Front Page
Previous by Thread: Re: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker
Next by Thread: Re: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads