TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PDF v paper From:Don Timmerman <timmerma -at- IPDLINK -dot- IPD -dot- ANL -dot- GOV> Date:Wed, 16 Dec 1998 15:49:18 -0600
>On-line documentation is a far superior format. No one can argue that
>full-colour graphics, audible instructions and animated screen-shots aren't
>superior to a black and white text.
I think the user has to determine which format is superior. No doubt
on-line docs may be far superior for some applications, but I can't
see a mechanic descending into a steam pit (where the temperature is
100 degrees F and the humidity is about 90 percent) carrying a laptop
(which the company will never buy him anyway) so he can validate the
position of 50 or so steam and condensate valves before he begins his
work. I forgot to tell you, the mechanic also has no place to lay his
laptop except on a hot steam or condensate line (200 to 300 degrees)
because the concrete floor is covered with water and there aren't any
desks in a steam pit. When he is done with his work, he climbs out of
the steam pit and the temperature is 15 degrees F (because it's winter
in Chicago) and all that humidity inside the laptop just condensed on
all the internal components.
I think the mechanic will prefer a one-page drawing to the on-line
Argonne National Laboratory (near Chicago)