[no subject]

From: David Orr <dorr -at- ORRNET -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 10:34:47 -0600

In two successive posts, Diane Haugan wrote the following:

>Excuse me if I seem miffed. I am. Somehow your gee-whiz enthusiasm
>doesn't mask what I perceive as a really snide attitude on your part
>the naivete of reviewers.

>Your motivations may be honorable, but without checking on what kinds
>resources already exist, carefully considering the copyright issues,
>clearly outlining how what you propose is different from the existing
>resources, your enthusiasm, for all it's genuineness, looks,


I find your substantive remarks informative, but I am not interested in
in being attacked personally in public. You don't know me at all, so you
are not qualified to make judgements on my motivations. I won't reply to
any further posts that contain personal attacks.

David Orr
Orr & Associates Corporation

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Re: Soliciting Book Reviews (amended)
Next by Author: Personal attacks, was RE:Soliciting Book Reviews
Previous by Thread: Re: Bonus Plans
Next by Thread: Personal attacks, was RE:Soliciting Book Reviews

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads