Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid

Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
From: Marsha Kamish <MKamish -at- STEWART -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:24:16 -0600

I think you're in the minority.

Marsha G. Kamish
Documentation Specialist
Landata Systems, Inc.
Houston, Texas
713-479-2571
mkamish -at- stewart -dot- com

The opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily representative of
Landata Systems, Inc.

http://www.flash.net/~mgkamish

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Martin [mailto:smithmr -at- ENCORP -dot- COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 5:17 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid


Is that really necessary. After enduring endless discussions, month
after month, about the merits of using one or two periods, Mr. Plato's
posts are the only ones that I read on a regular basis. I appreciate his
no nonsense approach. I too have encountered employers that, for good
reason, have a very poor opinion of technical writers in general. I have
also worked for companies that tossed the resume of anyone proclaiming
membership in STC as a matter of policy.


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Frame 5.5 and sis6326 video driver problem
Next by Author: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
Previous by Thread: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
Next by Thread: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads