Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid

Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
From: John Gilger <jgilger_it -at- NV -dot- DOE -dot- GOV>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:35:40 -0800

I have to agree with this one. Without some occasional humor and satire,
this list wouldn't be worth much.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Martin [SMTP:smithmr -at- ENCORP -dot- COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 3:17 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <----
stupid

Is that really necessary. After enduring endless discussions,
month
after month, about the merits of using one or two periods, Mr.
Plato's
posts are the only ones that I read on a regular basis. I
appreciate his
no nonsense approach. I too have encountered employers that, for
good
reason, have a very poor opinion of technical writers in
general. I have
also worked for companies that tossed the resume of anyone
proclaiming
membership in STC as a matter of policy.




From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: What am I worth?
Next by Author: Re: [2] Request for Proposal forms
Previous by Thread: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
Next by Thread: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads