Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid

Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
From: MAGGIE SECARA <SECARAM -at- MAINSAVER -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:40:27 -0800

I'm not usually inclined to march to the front of the hall just to say Me
Too, but Joel just beat me to what I wanted to say. Well, I have been
working all day.

So IF this is a voting question (and there's no guarantee that it is) I have
to say I agree with Joel's view.

Yes, Andrew, I think you were over the top this time, but it balances out.

Cheers!

Maggie Secara

Compendium of Common Knowledge
http://ren.dm.net


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Turnipseed [SMTP:JTurnipseed -at- DATAWORKSMPLS -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 3:55 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
>
> God help us if Andrew is bounced. Though he is occassionally annoying, and
> it is hard to believe that someone so incalculably funny couldn't find
> more
> time to be incalculably helpful (he knows his stuff, apparently), it would
> be a shame to lose one of this list's better attractions.
>


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: TW newsgroups in Europe?
Next by Author: Re: technical question - MSWord virus
Previous by Thread: Re: What a drag (on technical writing) <---- stupid
Next by Thread: Re: What a drag...Andrew that is


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads