Re: Doc Quality

Subject: Re: Doc Quality
From: "Cheryl L. Higgins" <cwhitnah -at- NETMEG -dot- NET>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:31:03 -0500

Yes, I would think this depends on the review. If the review is of the
product, then that's what they are reviewing. If the review is of the
accompanying texts , helps, or publications, then they would address the
quality of the writing.

Cheryl L. Higgins
cwhitnah -at- netmeg -dot- net
'The hills show scalp and lift trees/ listless against no wind and less
birds/ leeching sky with bony fingers /like close-cropped hair, thin and
wired up to formless clouds/ their boles weighted, pulled down by great
shags of vine: /bittersweet, greenbriar, wild grape' "Midwinter, coastal
New England'

>why is it, that when I read Product Reviews in various
>technical/computing publications, I can almost *never* find 1 comment on
>the quality of the doc, hard copy or online! The only focus is on the
>product itself!

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Re: Again, Publisher
Next by Author: Re: Screen Captures
Previous by Thread: Doc Quality
Next by Thread: Screen Captures

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads