Re: (Zachary) tayloring (Rant/Long)

Subject: Re: (Zachary) tayloring (Rant/Long)
From: Scott Miller <smiller -at- PORTAL -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:59:16 -0800

Very true, but any person I would like to work for or with would recognize
that an email message has different quality requirements than a manual. More
important, every post is not just an example of your grammarly
fastidiousness, but also of your thoughts, ideas, and priorities. They would
probably wonder about my priorities if I advocated running a grammar checker
on email.

- Scott M
smiller -at- portal -dot- com

> I don't think it can get much clearer than that: every post you make is a
> sample of your work.

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Re: (Zachary) tayloring (Rant/Long)
Next by Author: Re: Why grammar/spelling/style matters (Was: (Zachary) tayloring (Ran t/Long))
Previous by Thread: Re: (Zachary) tayloring (Rant/Long)
Next by Thread: Synonym for Rollback

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads