TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Should I Say Something? From:Eric Ray <ejr -at- RAYCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 17 May 1999 10:31:47 -0600
At 08:39 AM 5/17/99 -0700, John Posada wrote:
>> I had an interview last week and during the course
>> of that interview, I asked for some samples, so that
>> I could see what they did.
>> When I sat down to read what they had written I
>> found quite a few mistakes. It occurred to me that I
>> could correct them of say nothing. I want the job
>> and I'm not sure that saying anything would help.
>If you aren't sure it would help, then don't. You are
>already there for the interview, so get the job based
>on that interview, based on previous situations that
>you know something about. Not knowing the environment,
>the pecking order, the procedues, and processes, you
>could end up screwing yourself out of the job. What if
>what you critique something that was written by the
>person you are interviewing with and he was real proud
>of that content?
Fundamentally, John has a good point--saying anything
other than "Thanks for letting me look at these samples"
has a far greater chance of resulting in NOT getting the
job than getting the job. However, depending on
how badly you want/need the job, critiquing the samples
might be exactly what you WANT to do.
If you know that you want to work for a person/group/
organization/company that does not stifle new ideas
or perspectives, that can gracefully accept criticism,
that responds well to the way that you present comments,
and that isn't thin-skinned, go for it. It's a gambler's
approach, but will quickly and surely ensure that you're
not going to work for someone who is pretty sensitive
or for a stodgy company or for a place in which you
personally wouldn't fit particularly well.