Re: Usability Testing

Subject: Re: Usability Testing
From: Melonie Holliman <melonie -dot- holliman -at- TXEXMTA4 -dot- AMD -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 13:35:01 -0500

Howdy,

I actually like being part of the testing process when I can do it my way.
One time and one time only, I participated in the official "test run" of a
software. We sat and clicked on the same series of buttons over and
over and over and over. Luckily, they only required two hour shifts. If I
would have had to do it any longer, I think I would have screamed.

I can understand why the original poster was frustrated if that is what he
was
up against.

Melonie R. Holliman
Technical Writer
CPD Marketing
Advanced Micro Devices

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leona Dupree [SMTP:llmdupree -at- YAHOO -dot- COM]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 1:31 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Usability Testing
>
> I never hand over my documentation without testing it against the
> product. I don't mind testing what I have written because I want to
> make sure it works according to what the software does. Why would any
> Technical Writer have a problem with this being a part of the writing
> process, if there are no QA personnel on board?
> ===
> Sincerely,
> Leona L. Magee-Dupree
>
>
> Have a nice day!
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =
>


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: Constructive Criticism (WAS:Should I Say Something?)
Next by Author: Re: Rumors of FrameMaker's Death are Untrue, says Adobe
Previous by Thread: Re: Usability Testing
Next by Thread: Re: Usability Testing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads