TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Phrasing recommendations From:Robert Heath <robert -dot- heath -at- FRITZ -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 May 1999 12:39:01 -0700
> We dealt with this a lot when I was at Intuit, and here's
> what we came up
> with: Use the imperative and an objective point of view. For
> example, "For
> best results, use the default..." The imperative is stronger
> than any "we
> recommend..." or "It is recommended..." statements. Also,
> when you use the
> imperative tone, you leave fewer unanswered questions for the
> user, such as,
> "It is recommended by who? Why is it recommended?" Generally,
> all users want
> the "best results." And you can qualify circumstances in
> which they wouldn't
> choose the default in a note or subsection.
However, you still leave unanswered the user's question of why the default
produces the best results. It therefore strikes me as slightly patronizing,
reminding me of the expression "Father knows best."
On the other hand, it's a minor point for the user unconcerned with the
details. Most users, I assume, will simply want to get the job done quickly.
Fritz Companies, Inc.
San Francisco, CA