TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Any issues on NT? From:"Campbell, Art" <artc -at- NORTHCHURCH -dot- NET> Date:Fri, 23 Jul 1999 16:41:31 -0400
It's much more stable than either 9x platform, in my experience. I'm running
most of the aps you mention but rely more on FrameMaker for production and
Office for more general stuff.
Norton Utilities for NT, which you should have anyway, includes a defrag
Five Corporate Drive
Andover, MA 01810
From: Dick Margulis [mailto:ampersandvirgule -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 3:48 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Any issues on NT?
Please pardon the cross-post, but the question is the same for each
I'm being offered an upgrade to a new computer. Standard policy for new
machines is to go with NT, but I'm being offered the opportunity to stay
with W95 or 98 if it will make my life easier.
What are the considerations? Do I need a different version of
application software? What do I need to know about Type 1 font handling?
TT font handling?
If anyone who has been through this transition can shed some light, I'd
be most grateful.
The applications I am concerned about are:
Acrobat (currently 3, but willing to try 4 if you can convince me it's
stable under NT)
And a more generic NT user question. It doesn't come with a built in
defrag utility. Is it worthwhile to get a third-party tool, or does the
OS handle disk management well enough without it?