Re: Relative terms on interface

Subject: Re: Relative terms on interface
From: Bob Gembey <bob -at- SUPERNOVA -dot- NL>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:53:54 +0200

> > Sounds like you've run yourself up against single-word-overload. When
you
> > try to squeeze more work out of one single word than it's built for it
gets
> > a bit cryptic. Have you considered using explanatory sub-heads? They
help
> > greatly to tell the reader more clearly what awaits him. I'd be inclined
to
> > say something like
> >
> > ENHANCED
> > Allows colors, logos and graphic effects
> >
> > BASIC
> > For text-only reports
> >
> > But I don't know if your buttons/tabs allow this.
> >
Isn't that what tool-tips are for?

Bob

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=


Previous by Author: Re: the interview question, from the interviewer's pov
Next by Author: Re: Non-Acrobat PDF viewers
Previous by Thread: Re: Relative terms on interface
Next by Thread: Re: Relative terms on interface


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads