RE: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs

Subject: RE: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs
From: "Halter, Meg" <HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 07:52:24 -0700

Hi Jacque --

I've been running NT4 for years now and have had few problems. It's more
stable than 95 and 98. Installing hardware is a little harder because it
doesn't have plug & play. Also, it's more expensive. Haven't used it with
any of the applications you mention but it's worked great with all the
analysis tools I've loaded. Good luck

-- Meg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacque Foreman [SMTP:foremangraphics -at- juno -dot- com]
> Subject: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs
> What I need to know is any of you is running (or quit running because of
> system problems) NT4. What are the major disadvantages you have found
> using NT as your op sys?
> You need to know that, whatever op sys I use it must be compatible with
> PageMaker 6 & 6.5+, Quark 3.32 (Quark 4 if I get around to upgrading),
> PhotoShop 5 (&5.5), Illustrator7 (&8), Olympus 200 (old digital camera)
> software, Designer 3 (&4), Corel4.

Previous by Author: RE: Only slightly OT - Looking for a Trifold Word Template
Next by Author: RE: How do users use help?
Previous by Thread: RE: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs
Next by Thread: FW: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads