TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> <<Have you ever used "prompt" as a
> synonym for "ask"? Like so: "A "yes" answer allows the
> system to find any new or invalid wuddleblups and prompt
> the user whether the new wuddleblups should be added and
> the invalid ones deleted.">>
I think prompt is legitimately a verb. For instance, there has
always been a person called a prompter in the theater, who prompts people if
they forget their lines.
I don't think prompt is exactly a synonym for *ask*. I think of it
more like providing a cue to do something. The cue can be a question, but
could also be something else. For instance, it might be an instruction. e.g.
please enter your pasword. Or just a label, such as: *Name*. The prompts in
command shells are just a short word or two, or even just a character, that
lets us know (cues us) that the shell is waiting for us to enter a command.
The shell could just as easily display a question for a prompt (e.g., what
do you want me to do now?), but it doesn't.
In other words, yes, I use *prompt* as a verb all the time. "The
system will prompt you to enter your name." I think its more accurate than
*ask* and keeps the computer in proper perspective as a machine, not a buddy
who wants to get to know us better.
Systech Corporation, San Diego, CA mailto:janetv -at- systech -dot- com